Grading criterias

[lenfra]

Proper grading criterias must be established for the review assignment.

[dbosk]

The same for the project. This will become easier once we have the ILOs that are currently being worked on in the [abstract branch](https://github.com/OpenSecEd/research/tree/abstract): ```latex \begin{itemize} \item \emph{evaluate} the usability of security solutions and \emph{suggest} improvements that improve usability and security. \item \emph{evaluate} threats, possible protection mechanisms and \emph{design} a high-level approach to protection which considers usability. \item \emph{overview} the field of information security, \emph{understand} your own limits and where to search for solutions, e.g.\ experts or published research results that are relevant to the solution of a problem. \item \emph{analyse and apply} the results of published research in the security field. \end{itemize} ``` Then we can define scales for each of the `\emph`ed verbs.

[dbosk]

The ones used 2018 (written up by Lennart):

• E Performed a literature study covering a few research papers/articles (1-2).
  No contributions.
• D All the criterias for E has been fullfilled, but not all for C.
• C All criterias for E, but with a stronger basis for the literature study (3-4
  research papers / articles), and have made an own contribution, such as
  reproduced an article, performed a survey using similar method as the
  articles used.
• B All the criterias for C has been fullfilled, but not all for A.
• A All critieras for C, but with a stronger contribution, such as improving
  the method used, or providing own suggestions on how to improve the
  result. The report should be able to be sent as a contribution to a research
  conference or scientific journal.

[dbosk]

There is an attempt at grading criteria in devel. But it must be revised.

[dbosk]

WIP in #7 (and #6).

[dbosk]

Merged #7.