-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
Description
Hi there, first of all thx for the effort to create an open source-alternative for all that social-libraries.
I just started to have a look and stumbled over the agpl license for the server. As with all licenses I'm not 100% but very sure, that that means, as soon as you are just using an agpl-licensed product in your own product (no matter if you integrate or just use its rest-api) you are forced to opensource your product to every user of your project. (according to gpl that just forces to do this if you link against it)
I recently had the same problem with the neo4j-database that has chosen gpl (nice for server) in the community edition but agpl on the enterprise edition which prevents a closed-source project (no matter if integrating it or just calling its rest-layer).
So my question is, is this license chosen on purpose for the same reason? Are you double licensing the server for commerically used closed source games?
EDIT: Ok, i just found out that the clients are licensed under apache-license, so it is easy, thx. Nevertheless that does still mean that it is not possible to write your own client without agpl to take over the whole project, right!?