For copi.owasp.org, To improve privacy and security, we should not let the players choose their own name and give the game a name, instead the player names should be choosen from a random list of 82 character names (equal to the number of cards). These characters names culd later be extended with their own profiles and background stories to make it more fun and increase the engagement. We should do the same with game names.
The character names could be a combination of hacker names, poker player names and FBI agent names, or something else fun.
The games names could be known security breaches or something else that would be recognizable.
NB: @rewtd , @cw-owasp this may seem a bit silly. My concern here is that not everyone understands that they shouldn’t add personal or sensitive information when creating a game. Instead of implementing disclaimers, this might be better.
For copi.owasp.org, To improve privacy and security, we should not let the players choose their own name and give the game a name, instead the player names should be choosen from a random list of 82 character names (equal to the number of cards). These characters names culd later be extended with their own profiles and background stories to make it more fun and increase the engagement. We should do the same with game names.
The character names could be a combination of hacker names, poker player names and FBI agent names, or something else fun.
The games names could be known security breaches or something else that would be recognizable.
NB: @rewtd , @cw-owasp this may seem a bit silly. My concern here is that not everyone understands that they shouldn’t add personal or sensitive information when creating a game. Instead of implementing disclaimers, this might be better.