I noticed some other smaller bugs that haven’t been handled, but they’re all mapping limitations and we can address these in the next release.
3:33
For example, the below structure:
"Morphology": {
"cell morphology": [
{
"@ref": 68367,
"cell shape": "rod-shaped"
},
{
"@ref": 68367,
"gram stain": "positive"
}
],
"colony morphology": {
"@ref": 18803,
"type of hemolysis": "gamma",
"incubation period": "1-2 days"
}
}
We make the assumption that “cell morphology” can only be a dict, but turns out it can be a list too. We need to be able to represent things like this in the mapping file and the new structure that Mark came up with can accommodate that.
@sujaypatil96
I noticed some other smaller bugs that haven’t been handled, but they’re all mapping limitations and we can address these in the next release.
3:33
For example, the below structure:
"Morphology": {
"cell morphology": [
{
"@ref": 68367,
"cell shape": "rod-shaped"
},
{
"@ref": 68367,
"gram stain": "positive"
}
],
"colony morphology": {
"@ref": 18803,
"type of hemolysis": "gamma",
"incubation period": "1-2 days"
}
}
We make the assumption that “cell morphology” can only be a dict, but turns out it can be a list too. We need to be able to represent things like this in the mapping file and the new structure that Mark came up with can accommodate that.
@sujaypatil96