It is not immediately obvious how the size of the logo, which in turn determines the size of the margins and the width of the borders, should scale with the paper size (and orientation). What I had done before looked well for my own poster (A1 landscape) but looked tiny on portrait posters.
I have now changed it to scale with paper height rather than whichever dimension was smaller. This makes the logo larger in portrait. But perhaps it becomes too small with smaller sizes?
A similar issue exists with the font scaling, which is a bit of a workaround to allow larger text than LaTeX would ordinarily allow. But how we should scale the font with paper size is an open question.
I look forward to your input.
It is not immediately obvious how the size of the logo, which in turn determines the size of the margins and the width of the borders, should scale with the paper size (and orientation). What I had done before looked well for my own poster (A1 landscape) but looked tiny on portrait posters.
I have now changed it to scale with paper height rather than whichever dimension was smaller. This makes the logo larger in portrait. But perhaps it becomes too small with smaller sizes?
A similar issue exists with the font scaling, which is a bit of a workaround to allow larger text than LaTeX would ordinarily allow. But how we should scale the font with paper size is an open question.
I look forward to your input.