Skip to content

Interpretation in DeepConf #7

@PREPONDERANCE

Description

@PREPONDERANCE

https://github.com/JamesSand/UsefulCommands/blob/master/08-Research-utils/qiang-ideas/deepconf.md

I came across this from DeepConf issue section. Specifically, you've mentioned that we actually wanted the q to be sharper. This means the first item in the decomposed equation would have lower values (rather than higher values). So the problem lingers: does the author actually confuses certainty and uncertainty or the interpretation leads somewhere else.

Thanks in advance. This is a great repo!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions