From 890773d9dc82a8f0cef87e8e6456fa9f39c78da1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: InauguralPhysicist Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 18:19:20 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] ci: bump pinned EigenScript runtime v0.26.0 -> v0.27.0 CI clone pin + CLAUDE.md prose in the same change so they can't drift. Suite verified green against the v0.27.0 content in the pre-tag sweep. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 --- .github/workflows/ci.yml | 2 +- CLAUDE.md | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/.github/workflows/ci.yml b/.github/workflows/ci.yml index 5e5fea7..b4c5c51 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/ci.yml +++ b/.github/workflows/ci.yml @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ jobs: - name: Build EigenScript run: | - git clone --branch v0.26.0 --depth 1 https://github.com/InauguralSystems/EigenScript.git /tmp/eigenscript + git clone --branch v0.27.0 --depth 1 https://github.com/InauguralSystems/EigenScript.git /tmp/eigenscript cd /tmp/eigenscript && make build echo "/tmp/eigenscript/src" >> $GITHUB_PATH diff --git a/CLAUDE.md b/CLAUDE.md index ca16da8..9a611b4 100644 --- a/CLAUDE.md +++ b/CLAUDE.md @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Minimum is **v0.11.8** — the earliest release that runs the CDCL suite green. The floor is set by a v0.11.x VM fix, not by stdlib integer vectors (those shipped in v0.11.2, but that release still crashes the CDCL path). -CI builds and tests against EigenScript **v0.26.0** (pinned in +CI builds and tests against EigenScript **v0.27.0** (pinned in `.github/workflows/ci.yml`): the correctness suite is green — all `test_solver.eigs` assertions and the full `run_smoke.sh` pass. The `Inline tiny accessors in CDCL hot path` commit captures the hoist @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ Latest commits are the budgeted, resumable CDCL sessions (the one-shot solve is re-derived from them), landed via PR #56. The benchmark surface is mature — most current work is data-driven decisions out of `docs/EIGENSCRIPT_FEEDBACK.md`. Verified green on -EigenScript v0.26.0 (correctness suite only; not an `n=5` perf claim). +EigenScript v0.27.0 (correctness suite only; not an `n=5` perf claim). ## Gotchas