Current Conda tests only work for new users. #65
Description
🐛 Bug Report
Our current test
if [ ! -d "$WORK/miniconda3" ]; then
Tests a specific location to see if conda exists. But more advanced users may have already install conda. This leads to the Container breaking.
See Below:
INFO: Converting OCI blobs to SIF format
INFO: Starting build...
...
+ echo Installing...
Installing...
+ mkdir -p /work/00576/yosuke/ls6/miniconda3
+ curl https://repo.anaconda.com/miniconda/Miniconda3-py311_23.10.0-1-Linux-x86_64.sh -o /work/00576/yosuke/ls6/miniconda3/miniconda.sh
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0
57 115M 57 65.8M 0 0 71.7M 0 0:00:01 --:--:-- 0:00:01 71.6M
100 115M 100 115M 0 0 81.8M 0 0:00:01 0:00:01 --:--:-- 81.8M
+ bash /work/00576/yosuke/ls6/miniconda3/miniconda.sh -b -u -p /work/00576/yosuke/ls6/miniconda3
PREFIX=/work/00576/yosuke/ls6/miniconda3
Unpacking payload ...
0%| | 0/70 [00:00<?, ?it/s]
concurrent.futures.process._RemoteTraceback:
'''
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "concurrent/futures/process.py", line 387, in wait_result_broken_or_wakeup
File "multiprocessing/connection.py", line 256, in recv
TypeError: __init__() missing 1 required positional argument: 'msg'
'''
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "entry_point.py", line 69, in <module>
File "concurrent/futures/process.py", line 562, in _chain_from_iterable_of_lists
File "concurrent/futures/_base.py", line 609, in result_iterator
File "concurrent/futures/_base.py", line 446, in result
File "concurrent/futures/_base.py", line 391, in __get_result
concurrent.futures.process.BrokenProcessPool: A process in the process pool was terminated abruptly while the future was running or pending.
[2977838] Failed to execute script 'entry_point' due to unhandled exception!