On my desktop I usually run bleeding edge spack to test things there as well.
Generally, we should be prepared to upgrade spack from time to time to get support for newer OSes (macos 11?) and base packages.
spack 0.14 switched spack load from using environment-modules to an internal method of modifying the ennvironment. That internal method is not customizable currently.
There are some bad side effects. Like LD_LIBRARY_PATH is getting each and every directory (see spack/spack#3955 (comment)).
We might look into spack module {tcl,lmod} loads FOO or look deeper into lmod integration.
On my desktop I usually run bleeding edge spack to test things there as well.
Generally, we should be prepared to upgrade spack from time to time to get support for newer OSes (macos 11?) and base packages.
spack 0.14 switched
spack loadfrom using environment-modules to an internal method of modifying the ennvironment. That internal method is not customizable currently.There are some bad side effects. Like LD_LIBRARY_PATH is getting each and every directory (see spack/spack#3955 (comment)).
We might look into
spack module {tcl,lmod} loads FOOor look deeper into lmod integration.