Rust Rewrite

[ziggybaz]

For better performance, kindly rewrite the entire program in Rust.

[GEOEGII555]

C++ has better performance. See PR #694 .

[ziggybaz]

@GEOEGII555 maybe we write it in both, not a complete waste of time, and do benchmarks to settle the debate.

Rust vs C++ to decide the one to rule them all.

[GEOEGII555]

@GEOEGII555 maybe we write it in both, not a complete waste of time, and do benchmarks to settle the debate.

Rust vs C++ to decide the one to rule them all.

I don't know how to program in Rust, so you'll have to program the Rust version yourself.

[VenkataBhaskarr]

Sorry to interrupt please end the debate rust vs c++ already and use zig btw.

[Jayklutch]

I have opened a ticket for 8086 assembly to be used over rust or c++ for speed concerns.

[GEOEGII555]

I have opened a ticket for 8086 assembly to be used over rust or c++ for speed concerns.

Just because people can write good assembly doesn't mean that they will. You need to be a very good 8086 programmer to even get close to that. C++ compilers are extremely good at optimization.

[Tylersuard]

I recommend we use machine code, zeros and ones, to optimize this repo even further. If my calculations are correct, we can make the code run even faster if we forget about the ones and only use zeroes.