./guide/1.Project.ipynb

[edobrowolska]

• not clear property of urls for the projects now explained in the comments of new version of the notebook

• The instruction in the markdown cells are updated with clearer description of the process

• Variables are defined in OSC as geophysical, climate and environmental variables selected from WMO OSCAR Database, complemented by the GCMD Keywords Database

• the GCMD database mention indicators not valriable as the WMO. Maybe it could worth a clarification about what name to use. Can the user use one or the other? Are there instructions about one or the other?
  A: Note added that the user may use EarthCODE search to discover the variables.

• corrected typos in the description in the comments and markdown cells

• Removed mentioning of workflow/code but just referring to workflow to be more specific

• property: consortium members: Is the tuple provided within round brackets? Shall it be separated by coma or simply multiple round brackets? Eg: [("", ""),("", "")] or [("", "")("", "")]. I would also remove the email as a mandatory element in the tuple, since then that email will remain in the PR without consensus of being publicly available.. . We should specify in the comments or inside the how to add multiple institutions as consortium members.

• think of removing the Licence property from the Project entry, since we have it specified for Product and workflows / experiments etc. Then it is duplication. This way we would avoid having "various licenses" for the project since it will be clear for Product and the code.