[Bug] Lightweight HRPs don't hull boost

[GaryxGaming]

Coriolis-data doesn't seem to have hullboost for HRPs, which I'd assume prevents the lightweight blueprint from applying hull boost to them, leading to ships reporting lower HP than they should have.

I'd assume doing this to every HRP would fix it since that's how hull boost is done in bulkheads.

{
      "hullreinforcement": 390,
      "hullboost": 0.0,
      "class": 5,
      "cost": 450000,
      "edID": 128668546,
      "eddbID": 1382,
      "causres": 0,
      "explres": 0.025,
      "grp": "hr",
      "id": "2d",
      "kinres": 0.025,
      "mass": 16,
      "rating": "D",
      "thermres": 0.025,
      "symbol": "Int_HullReinforcement_Size5_Class2",
      "ukName": "Hull Reinforcement",
      "ukDiscript": "Increases the ship's hull integrity and resistance to damage."
}

[alex-williams]

Interesting... can you confirm that coriolis is reporting incorrect HP values with the blueprint applied? If so, I can look into that.

[GaryxGaming]

It does report incorrect HP.

Anaconda with unengineered 1D HRP.

With lightweight 1D HRP.
The HRP is reduced by 22 points, but it should also increase the HP from bulkheads by 131.25 points due to hull boost, which it does not. Anaconda is one of the few ships that should get more HP from lightweight 1D HRPs than heavy duty.

[alex-williams]

It does report incorrect HP.

Anaconda with unengineered 1D HRP. With lightweight 1D HRP. The HRP is reduced by 22 points, but it should also increase the HP from bulkheads by 131.25 points due to hull boost, which it does not. Anaconda is one of the few ships that should get more HP from lightweight 1D HRPs than heavy duty.

I would like to confirm in-game that the figures are lower and by the expected amounts before editing the way Coriolis has always done these calcs. I have seen people complain that resistances and such were off in coriolis, so this may well be included in that statement, I just don't like to change things unless I can see proof that the numbers don't match the in-game numbers. I do have a few condas I could test, but I rarely get the time to start the game up these days.

[GaryxGaming]

I gotchu

[alex-williams]

I gotchu

So, can you show me this Ship panel without the lightweight engineering applied? I accept your premise entirely, but what I need, is proof that the armour health figure should be higher, with a lightweight engineering blueprint applied to the HRP and the exact build of that ship in coriolis, to confirm that Coriolis is reporting lower HP than in-game.

[GaryxGaming]

Without engineering, same as what outfitting says it'd get

Stock
Modified HRP

[alex-williams]

So to be clear...

This is WITH lightweight engineering applied to an HRP

And this is without?

[GaryxGaming]

That is correct.