|
| 1 | +name: Code Review |
| 2 | +description: A code review conducted with a Technical Leader (TL) or the course instructor. |
| 3 | +title: "Code Review" |
| 4 | +body: |
| 5 | + - type: markdown |
| 6 | + attributes: |
| 7 | + value: | |
| 8 | + Please respond to the following questions about the project. |
| 9 | + - type: checkboxes |
| 10 | + attributes: |
| 11 | + label: Functional requirements |
| 12 | + description: Check each of the following satisfied functional requirements |
| 13 | + options: |
| 14 | + - label: "Code solves the issue presented" |
| 15 | + required: True |
| 16 | + - label: "Code functions, even if not fully solving the issue presented" |
| 17 | + required: True |
| 18 | + - label: "Performance of the code is acceptable" |
| 19 | + required: True |
| 20 | + - type: checkboxes |
| 21 | + attributes: |
| 22 | + label: Code style and legibility |
| 23 | + description: Check each of the following checkboxes that describe code legibility |
| 24 | + options: |
| 25 | + - label: The code contains comments |
| 26 | + required: True |
| 27 | + - label: Variable names are accurate and appropriate |
| 28 | + required: True |
| 29 | + - label: The code is easy to read |
| 30 | + required: True |
| 31 | + - label: The code is formatted correctly |
| 32 | + required: True |
| 33 | + - type: markdown |
| 34 | + attributes: |
| 35 | + value: | |
| 36 | + Conduct a short walkthrough with the programmer, marking the topics appropriately explained. |
| 37 | + - type: checkboxes |
| 38 | + attributes: |
| 39 | + label: Code walkthrough |
| 40 | + description: Check each of the following checkboxes that describe code legibility |
| 41 | + options: |
| 42 | + - label: The author understands the arithmetic operators used |
| 43 | + required: True |
| 44 | + - label: The author described the role of variables with adequate detail |
| 45 | + required: True |
| 46 | + - label: The author clearly connected the code to the problem presented in the assignment |
| 47 | + required: True |
| 48 | + - label: The author described their process well, communicating confidence and understanding of their own code |
| 49 | + required: True |
| 50 | + - type: textarea |
| 51 | + attributes: |
| 52 | + label: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly |
| 53 | + description: Write a short note with at least 3 aspects done well, and 3 aspects on which the code could be improved |
| 54 | + value: | |
| 55 | + Positives |
| 56 | + 1. |
| 57 | + 2. |
| 58 | + 3. |
| 59 | + Improvements |
| 60 | + 1. |
| 61 | + 2. |
| 62 | + 3. |
| 63 | + validations: |
| 64 | + required: true |
0 commit comments