-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathtalks_1.Rmd
More file actions
41 lines (28 loc) · 2.64 KB
/
talks_1.Rmd
File metadata and controls
41 lines (28 loc) · 2.64 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
---
title: "Talks"
output:
html_document:
theme: cosmo
---
```{=html}
<style type="text/css">
h1.title {
font-size: 36px;
font-weight: 500;
color: DarkRed;
text-align: center;
}
</style>
```
<br>
1. [Introduction to CompARE for Binary Endpoints](https://www.grbio.eu/compare/compareCover/workshop/Workshop.html#1){target="_blank"}
2. [M. Bofill, G. Gómez, M. Posch and F. Koening (2023-09-06). Adaptive selection of binary composite endpoints and sample size reassessment based on blinded data. Presentation for the 5th Conference of the Central European Network.](talks/06SEP23_Marta_BofillRoig.pdf){target="_blank"}
3. [J. Cortés, M. Bofill and G. Gómez, (2021-06-16). Two tools to study Composite Endpoints: CompARE and CompAREdesign. Workshop Biostatnet Software: celebrating 10 years of Biostatnet (online)](talks/2021BIOSTATNET_Workshop.pdf){target="_blank"}
4. [G. Gómez (2020-01-14). Exploring the use of composite endpoints in clinical trials. Oxford University Clinical Research Unit.](talks/OUCRUSem_Jan2020.pdf){target="_blank"}
5. [G. Gómez, J. Cortés and M. Bofill (2019). CompARE: a web app to study Composite Endpoints. International Society for Computational Biology (ISCB).](talks/2019ISCB_definitive.pdf){target="_blank"}
6. [M. Bofill and G. Gómez (2018-07-09). Sample Size Derivation for Composite Binary Endpoints Accounting for Departures of the Anticipated Values. XXIXth International Biometric Conference (IBC 2018)](talks/2018IBC.pdf){target="_blank"}
7. [G. Gómez (2017-09-15). Non-proportional hazards. Consequences on required sample sizes. Conferencia Española de Biometría (Sevilla).](talks/GomezSlides_CEB2017.pdf){target="_blank"}
8. [M. Bofill and G. Gómez (2017-05). The anticipated odds ratios to decide the choice of a primary binary endpoint. Conference of the Eastern Mediterranean Region of the International Biometric Society.](talks/2017EMRIBS.pdf){target="_blank"}
9. [G. Gómez (2017-05-27). Using composite endpoints in clinical trials. Dept. Biostatistics. Neurostatistics Working Group. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.](talks/GomezSlides_HarvardSem_May2017.pdf){target="_blank"}
10. [G. Gómez (2016-02-04). Planning clinical trials with composite endpoints. Statistical Inference, Decision and Operations Research (SiDOR). Universidad de Vigo (Vigo).](talks/VIGO-Feb2016.pdf){target="_blank"}
11. [G. Gómez (2014-11-21). Selecting the primary endpoint in a randomized clinical trial. How efficient is to add a new component to the primary endpoint?. Dept. Biostatistics. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.](talks/Talk_21Nov14.pdf){target="_blank"}