Skip to content

Commit d7f962a

Browse files
authored
Update index.html
Removed videos
1 parent 569348e commit d7f962a

1 file changed

Lines changed: 2 additions & 34 deletions

File tree

index.html

Lines changed: 2 additions & 34 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -546,27 +546,7 @@
546546
"price": "3,200,000,000",
547547
"availability": "https://schema.org/InStock"
548548
},
549-
"schemaVersion" : "https://schema.org/docs/releases.html#v29.2",
550-
"subjectOf": [
551-
{
552-
"@type": "VideoObject",
553-
"description": "Real physical experiment to measure the volume of a sphere using liquid displacement. The result proves the accuracy of the V=(√(3.2)r)³ formula over the conventional V=4/3πr³.",
554-
"duration": "PT1M26S",
555-
"name": "The sphere experiment",
556-
"thumbnailUrl": "https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7uxyLfh2B38/mqdefault.jpg",
557-
"uploadDate": "2024-04-19T15:25:17+01:00",
558-
"contentUrl": "https://youtu.be/7uxyLfh2B38"
559-
},
560-
{
561-
"@type": "VideoObject",
562-
"description": "Real physical experiment to measure the volume of a sphere using liquid displacement and a syringe. The result proves the accuracy of the V=(√(3.2)r)³ formula over the conventional V=4/3πr³.",
563-
"duration": "PT3M9S",
564-
"name": "The sphere experiment 2",
565-
"thumbnailUrl": "https://i.ytimg.com/vi/rXcJhFLLP0Y/mqdefault.jpg",
566-
"uploadDate": "2025-05-10T16:25:17+01:00",
567-
"contentUrl": "https://youtu.be/rXcJhFLLP0Y"
568-
}
569-
],
549+
"schemaVersion" : "https://schema.org/docs/releases.html#v29.3",
570550
"thumbnail": "android-chrome-256x256.png",
571551
"typicalAgeRange": "5-105",
572552
"url": "https://basic-geometry.github.io",
@@ -3485,21 +3465,9 @@ <h3 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px">
34853465
My calculations and experiments have consistently indicated a different relationship, expressed by the formula V = " cubic value of ( √( 3.2 ) × radius ) ", which provides a more accurate result when dealing with real, physical entities.
34863466
<br>
34873467
This formula isn't based on abstract geometric ideals alone but on tangible experiments where I've measured the volume of real spheres.
3488-
</p>
3489-
<br>
34903468
<br>
3491-
<div>
3492-
<iframe title="The sphere experiment" width="420" height="315" src="https://youtube.com/embed/7uxyLfh2B38">
3493-
</iframe>
3494-
</div>
3495-
<br>
3496-
<br>
3497-
<div>
3498-
<iframe title="The sphere experiment 2" width="420" height="315" src="https://youtube.com/embed/rXcJhFLLP0Y">
3499-
</iframe>
3500-
</div>
35013469
<br>
3502-
<p style="margin:12px;">These measurements have shown a systematic difference compared to the theoretical predictions based on the traditional formula, suggesting that the way we mathematically describe the volume of a sphere might need to be reconsidered when applied to physical objects.
3470+
These measurements have shown a systematic difference compared to the theoretical predictions based on the traditional formula, suggesting that the way we mathematically describe the volume of a sphere might need to be reconsidered when applied to physical objects.
35033471
<br>
35043472
<br>
35053473
The " 4 / 3 × π × radius³ " formula is a very rough underestimate.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)