You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@@ -1101,7 +1115,7 @@ <h4 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px">Powers, numeral systems and basic geometry
1101
1115
</mrow>
1102
1116
</math>
1103
1117
</p>
1104
-
</div>
1118
+
</section>
1105
1119
<br>
1106
1120
<br>
1107
1121
<br>
@@ -1633,7 +1647,7 @@ <h4 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px">Powers, numeral systems and basic geometry
1633
1647
1634
1648
</script>
1635
1649
</div>
1636
-
<div>
1650
+
<section>
1637
1651
<pstyle="margin:12px;">The area of a triangle equals exactly the half of the area of a rectangle with a width equal to the base of the triangle and length equal to the height of the triangle.
1638
1652
<br>
1639
1653
<br>
@@ -1771,7 +1785,6 @@ <h4 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px">Powers, numeral systems and basic geometry
1771
1785
</msqrt>
1772
1786
</mrow>
1773
1787
</math>
1774
-
</div>
1775
1788
</section>
1776
1789
<br>
1777
1790
<br>
@@ -1943,7 +1956,8 @@ <h4 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px">Powers, numeral systems and basic geometry
1943
1956
<br>
1944
1957
<br>
1945
1958
<br>
1946
-
<section><strong>The Core Geometric System ™ fundamentally shifts its axioms from the abstract, zero-dimensional point to the square and the cube as the primary, physically-relevant units for measurement.
1959
+
<section>
1960
+
<strong>The Core Geometric System ™ fundamentally shifts its axioms from the abstract, zero-dimensional point to the square and the cube as the primary, physically-relevant units for measurement.
1947
1961
<br>
1948
1962
We define the properties of shapes like the circle and sphere not through abstract limits, but through their direct, rational relationship to these foundational units, resulting in the use of the rational constant 3.2 instead of the irrational pi.
1949
1963
</strong>
@@ -1997,10 +2011,11 @@ <h4 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px">Powers, numeral systems and basic geometry
1997
2011
<br>
1998
2012
<br>
1999
2013
<section>
2000
-
<strongstyle="font-size:160%;margin:7px">Area of a circle</strong>
2014
+
<strongstyle="font-size:160%;margin:7px">Area and circumference of a circle</strong>
2001
2015
<br>
2002
2016
<br>
2003
-
For centuries, the circle has been a symbol of mathematical elegance—and π its most iconic constant. But beneath the surface of tradition lies a deeper question: Are the formulas we use truly derived from geometric logic, or are they inherited approximations dressed in symbolic authority?
2017
+
<section>
2018
+
<pstyle="margin:12px;">For centuries, the circle has been a symbol of mathematical elegance—and π its most iconic constant. But beneath the surface of tradition lies a deeper question: Are the formulas we use truly derived from geometric logic, or are they inherited approximations dressed in symbolic authority?
2004
2019
<br>
2005
2020
<br>
2006
2021
This article revisits the foundations of circle geometry, challenging long-held assumptions and offering a more exact, algebraic alternative.
@@ -2063,9 +2078,9 @@ <h4 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px">Powers, numeral systems and basic geometry
2063
2078
<br>
2064
2079
Similarly, the area formula A = πr² is not a direct result of calculus. It’s reverse-engineered by multiplying the circumference formula C = 2πr by half the radius—treating the area as the sum of infinitesimal rings. While the method is algebraically valid, it bypasses the geometric logic that defines area: the comparison to a square.
2065
2080
</p>
2081
+
</section>
2066
2082
<br>
2067
2083
<br>
2068
-
</section>
2069
2084
<br>
2070
2085
<br>
2071
2086
<section>
@@ -2193,6 +2208,7 @@ <h4 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px">Powers, numeral systems and basic geometry
2193
2208
These values are exact, rational, and logically derived. They can be verified numerically, but more importantly, they can be proven algebraically—without relying on infinite fractions, symbolic shortcuts, or flawed assumptions.
2194
2209
</p>
2195
2210
</section>
2211
+
</section>
2196
2212
<br>
2197
2213
<br>
2198
2214
<br>
@@ -2380,7 +2396,6 @@ <h4 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px">Powers, numeral systems and basic geometry
2380
2396
</script>
2381
2397
<pstyle="margin:12px;" id="circle-area"></p>
2382
2398
</div>
2383
-
</section>
2384
2399
<br>
2385
2400
<br>
2386
2401
<section>
@@ -2756,10 +2771,11 @@ <h4 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px">Powers, numeral systems and basic geometry
2756
2771
The quadrant method proves that the area of a circle equals exactly 3.2 × radius², thus ruling out the validity of the π.
2757
2772
</p>
2758
2773
</section>
2774
+
</section>
2759
2775
<br>
2760
2776
<br>
2761
2777
<br>
2762
-
<div>
2778
+
<section>
2763
2779
<pstyle="font-size:160%;font-weight:bold;margin:7px">Area of a circle segment</p>
2764
2780
<br>
2765
2781
<div>
@@ -2879,7 +2895,7 @@ <h4 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px">Powers, numeral systems and basic geometry
2879
2895
<mi>r</mi>
2880
2896
</mrow>
2881
2897
</math>
2882
-
</div>
2898
+
</section>
2883
2899
<br>
2884
2900
<br>
2885
2901
<br>
@@ -3036,6 +3052,7 @@ <h4 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px">Powers, numeral systems and basic geometry
3036
3052
</div>
3037
3053
<br>
3038
3054
<br>
3055
+
<section>
3039
3056
<strong>Proof</strong>
3040
3057
<br>
3041
3058
<br>
@@ -3230,7 +3247,6 @@ <h4 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px">Powers, numeral systems and basic geometry
3230
3247
</section>
3231
3248
<br>
3232
3249
<br>
3233
-
<section>
3234
3250
<pstyle="margin:12px;"><b>Conclusion: Time to Move On</b>
3235
3251
<br>
3236
3252
<br>
@@ -3247,7 +3263,6 @@ <h4 style="font-size:160%;margin:7px">Powers, numeral systems and basic geometry
0 commit comments