You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
<h2itemprop="about" style="margin:12px">Once around 2018 I was wondering how to calculate the area of a circle.</h2>
99
+
<h2itemrel="description" style="margin:12px">Once around 2018 I was wondering how to calculate the area of a circle.</h2>
100
100
<br>
101
101
<section><h2itemrel="description" style="margin:12px">I remembered the number 3.14 called the pi, but I was interested in the logic of comparing the circle to a square.</h2>
102
102
<pstyle="margin:12px">Because the square is the basis of area calculation. That is why we use square units.
@@ -118,7 +118,6 @@ <h2 itemprop="about" style="margin:12px">Once around 2018 I was wondering how to
118
118
<br>
119
119
Then I worked out the relationship between the radius and the side of the square algebraically via the Pythagorean theorem.
@@ -129,7 +128,6 @@ <h2 itemprop="about" style="margin:12px">Once around 2018 I was wondering how to
129
128
</p>
130
129
</div>
131
130
<br>
132
-
<sectionitemrel="description">
133
131
<pstyle="margin:12px">That got me excited for obvious reasons, but also confused. Nobody thought of that before? Why is the pi so different?
134
132
<br>
135
133
For about a year I just kept thinking and calculating all aspects of that, and I shared my discovery just with a few friends. They didn't share my excitement.
@@ -139,14 +137,13 @@ <h2 itemprop="about" style="margin:12px">Once around 2018 I was wondering how to
139
137
</section>
140
138
<br>
141
139
<br>
142
-
<sectionitemrel="description">
143
-
<h2style="margin:12px">Meanwhile I figured that by extending the area of a circle to 3D, the volume of a sphere equals the cubed value of the square root of its cross-sectional area, just like a cube.</h2>
140
+
<section>
141
+
<h2itemrel="description" style="margin:12px">Meanwhile I figured that by extending the area of a circle to 3D, the volume of a sphere equals the cubed value of the square root of its cross-sectional area, just like a cube.</h2>
144
142
<pstyle="margin:12px">It's quite hard to physically accurately measure the volume of a ball, but there's a significant difference between the result of my V=(√(3.2)r)³ formula and the conventional " 4 / 3 × pi × r³ ".
145
143
<br>
146
144
<br>
147
145
I conducted some experiments with the resources that I had. I could not provide the accuracy that the subject deserves, but the results aligned better with my V=(√(3.2)r)³ formula.
<pstyle="margin:12px" itemrel="description">The second sphere experiment was done with the same ball and a nominal 5 ml syringe. The nominal volume of a syringe should be its real volume. However, I have measured its length and width to make sure and I found that its real volume is about 10% larger. I took that into account in the calculations.
166
164
</p>
167
165
</div>
166
+
</section>
168
167
<br>
169
168
<br>
170
169
<section>
171
-
<h2itemrel="about" style="margin:12px">I have derived the volume of a cone by comparing a vertical quadrant of a cone to an octant of a sphere.</h2>
172
-
<pitemrel="description" style="margin:12px">First I made a mistake in that. I knew that the height has to be divided by 2, not 3 as they usually do it, but I confused the vertical height with the slant height and I divided it by 2 only once, instead of twice. That resulted in an error.
170
+
<h2itemrel="description" style="margin:12px">I have derived the volume of a cone by comparing a vertical quadrant of a cone to an octant of a sphere.</h2>
171
+
<pstyle="margin:12px">First I made a mistake in that. I knew that the height has to be divided by 2, not 3 as they usually do it, but I confused the vertical height with the slant height and I divided it by 2 only once, instead of twice. That resulted in an error.
173
172
</p>
174
173
</section>
175
174
<br>
176
175
<br>
177
-
<sectionitemrel="description">
178
-
<h2style="margin:12px">In early 2020 there were news about that online education was introduced because of the pandemic.</h2>
176
+
<section>
177
+
<h2itemrel="description" style="margin:12px">In early 2020 there were news about that online education was introduced because of the pandemic.</h2>
179
178
<pstyle="margin:12px">I thought it was time to share my discoveries online, so I went to the local public library to publish them on a webpage. My volume formula for a cone and a pyramid was undeveloped and I didn't have much web development skills but I had to start somewhere. My attention was divided by lots of details in both geometry and IT.
180
179
<br>
181
180
<br>
@@ -205,21 +204,19 @@ <h2 style="margin:12px">In early 2020 there were news about that online educatio
205
204
They call that Euclidean geometry. I primarily regard my framework as a fix of the conventional one.
206
205
<br>
207
206
It's quite similar to the Euclidean, but apparently the key differences are that I don't define the point is as zero-dimensional and a line can have a thickness. These two make a big difference, especially in case of 3 dimensional solids.
208
-
</p>
209
-
</section>
210
207
<br>
211
208
<br>
209
+
Since conventional geometry is associated with the zero-dimensional point and Archimedes' flawed formulas, I figured that it's the best to start with a clear sheet.</p>
<iframetitle="Introduction to basic geometry" width="420" height="315" src="https://youtube.com/embed/U5eHkmmVVEA">
215
214
</iframe>
216
215
<br>
217
-
<pitemrel="description" style="margin:12px">Exactly determining the properties of different shapes is in the scope, which is not really about if it is Euclidean or not. But since that is associated with the zero-dimensional point and Archimedes' flawed formulas, I figured that it's the best to start with a clear sheet.</p>
218
-
</div>
216
+
<pitemrel="description" style="margin:12px">Exactly determining the properties of different shapes is in the scope.</div>
219
217
<br>
220
218
<br>
221
-
<sectionitemrel="description">
222
-
<h2style="margin:12px">I named my framework the Core Geometric System ™ and put the trademark symbol on it to indicate that this not just another abstract geometric system.</h2>
219
+
<h2style="margin:12px" itemrel="description">I named my framework the Core Geometric System ™ and put the trademark symbol on it to indicate that this not just another abstract geometric system.</h2>
223
220
<pstyle="margin:12px">The name reflects that my logic is built in accordance with the core principles of elementary mathematics. That is something that people assume of the conventional one and they have no idea how badly it deviated from that.
224
221
<br>
225
222
<br>
@@ -231,8 +228,8 @@ <h2 style="margin:12px">I named my framework the Core Geometric System ™ and p
231
228
</section>
232
229
<br>
233
230
<br>
234
-
<sectionitemrel="description">
235
-
<h2style="margin:12px">In 2024 I fixed the numeric value for my cone and pyramid volume formula. </h2>
231
+
<section>
232
+
<h2style="margin:12px"itemrel="description">In 2024 I fixed the numeric value for my cone and pyramid volume formula. </h2>
236
233
<pstyle="margin:12px">I'm sorry about that I had presented a wrong number for such a long time, but at least my logic was closer to reality.
237
234
<br>
238
235
<br>
@@ -252,8 +249,8 @@ <h2 style="margin:12px">In 2024 I fixed the numeric value for my cone and pyrami
252
249
</section>
253
250
<br>
254
251
<br>
255
-
<sectionitemrel="description">
256
-
<h2style="margin:12px">While trying to explain it to others, I have found that different people have different levels of education.</h2>
252
+
<section>
253
+
<h2style="margin:12px"itemrel="description">While trying to explain it to others, I have found that different people have different levels of education.</h2>
257
254
<pstyle="margin:12px">I thought I can't just start the explanation with the numbers and basic operations.
0 commit comments