main.aux

\relax 
\citation{Magistrale_1996_BSSA}
\citation{Magistrale_2000_BSSA}
\citation{Kohler_2003_BSSA}
\citation{Chen_2007_BSSA}
\citation{Lee_2014_JGR}
\citation{Taborda_2016}
\citation{Taborda_2014_BSSA}
\citation{Lee_2014_SRL}
\citation{Tu_2006_Proc}
\citation{Taborda_2010_Tech}
\citation{Anderson_2004_Proc}
\citation{SCEC}
\citation{SCEC}
\citation{Hauksson_2000_JGR}
\citation{Kohler_2003_BSSA}
\newlabel{firstpage}{{}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{1}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Major geologic structures in the region of interest including basins, valleys and mountains, along with the main quaternary faults.}}{1}}
\newlabel{fig:region}{{1}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Study domain and earthquake data}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Velocity models}{1}}
\citation{Lee_2014_JGR}
\citation{Chen_2007_BSSA}
\citation{Lee_2014_JGR}
\citation{Lee_2014_JGR}
\citation{Tromp_2005_GJI}
\citation{Zhao_2005_BSSA}
\citation{Olsen_1994_Thesis}
\citation{Lee_2014_JGR}
\citation{Gill_2015_SSA}
\citation{Lee_2014_JGR}
\citation{Lee_2014_JGR}
\citation{Taborda_2007_Proc}
\citation{Taborda_2007_Proc}
\citation{Tu_2003_Tech}
\citation{Tu_2006_Proc}
\citation{Taborda_2010_Tech}
\citation{Taborda_2013_BSSA}
\citation{Taborda_2014_BSSA}
\citation{Stein_2003_Book}
\citation{Shearer_2009_Book}
\citation{Anderson_2004_Proc}
\citation{Taborda_2013_BSSA}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Information for 30 events including their ID \citet  {SCEC}, magnitude and final number of stations.}}{2}}
\newlabel{tab:events}{{1}{2}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}simulation approach}{2}}
\newlabel{eq:qs}{{1}{2}}
\newlabel{eq:qp}{{2}{2}}
\newlabel{eq:esize}{{3}{2}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Evaluation Method}{2}}
\citation{Anderson_2004_Proc}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Comparison between the southern California community velocity models considered. Left: free-surface shear wave velocity, $V_{S}${}. Center: depth to the isosurface at which $V_{S}=1000$\nobreakspace  {}m/s. Right: depth to the isosurface at which $V_{S}=2500$\nobreakspace  {}m/s. }}{3}}
\newlabel{fig:hslices}{{2}{3}}
\newlabel{eq:s}{{4}{3}}
\citation{Taborda_2016}
\citation{Anderson_2004_Proc}
\citation{Taborda_2013_BSSA}
\citation{Taborda_2013_BSSA}
\citation{Taborda_2016}
\newlabel{eq:fs}{{5}{4}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}signal processing}{4}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Results}{4}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {8}Discussion and Conclusions}{4}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces GOF map for selected events with higher number of stations. Countours indicate the total FS score coming from the average of results in 3 directions. Event codes and their number of stations are mentioned in the plots. . all the events comparing 3 versions of CVM-S4.26 with CVM-S4 velocity model. Stations are depicted by dots and epicenters are located by stars. }}{5}}
\newlabel{fig:gof}{{3}{5}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces difference GOF map for all the events comparing 3 versions of CVM-S4.26 with CVM-S4 velocity model. Stations are depicted by dots and epicenters are located by stars. }}{6}}
\newlabel{fig:gof_diff}{{4}{6}}
\bibstyle{gji}
\bibdata{references}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Improvement GOF map Chino Hills earthquake for broad band and for different bandwidths. Stations are depicted by dots and epicenters are located by stars. }}{7}}
\newlabel{fig:bands}{{5}{7}}
\newlabel{lastpage}{{8}{7}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Summary of GOF results for all events. Values correspond to the average FS scores of all stations, in all components and frequency bands, discretized by velocity models. The values in the table to the right correspond to the mean value of the score for each velocity model considering all events. The areas under the lines for the values obtained with simulations using the velocity models CVM-S4.26.223, CVM-S4.26.222, CVM-S4.26.221 and CVM-4 are filled to highlight that CVM-S4.26.223 yields the largest number of events with the top value.}}{8}}
\newlabel{fig:gof.avg.all}{{6}{8}}